Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784603 --- Comment #3 from Haïkel Guémar <karlthered@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-01-25 22:23:58 EST --- * python26-xxx variants in EPEL5 are different packages, you'd need to submit another review http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob&type=package&terms=python26* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782613 (an example of python26 variant ticket) * for the summary, it's better than the previous one. * python3 variant builds fine and is usable. To me, your package fully complies with Fedora guidelines, you still have to be formally reviewed by a sponsor (which usually will ask you to do 2 or 3 informal reviews), try asking on irc (#fedora-devel @ freenode) or the mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review