Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768007 Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-01-18 16:14:53 EST --- Review: - $ rpmlint /home/tom/rpmbuild/SRPMS/python-flatland-0.0.2-1.fc16.src.rpm /home/tom/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/python-flatland-0.0.2-1.fc16.noarch.rpm python-flatland.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US namespace -> name space, name-space, names pace python-flatland.src: W: invalid-url Source0: jek-flatland-0938e70bb76d.tar.bz2 python-flatland.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US namespace -> name space, name-space, names pace 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. all ignorable - koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3712729 - source match upstream: 2a0185ad21e9f45a5be67fda5fb43b81 jek-flatland-0938e70bb76d.tar.bz2 - license ok NEEDSWORK: - please be more specific in %files: %{python_sitelib}/flatland-*py?.?.egg-info %{python_sitelib}/flatland/ - Query upstream to include license headers - Please add a check section: %check nosetests -v Then you see, there is at least one missing dep blinker (both BR and R). ======================================================================== Please implement the NEEDSWORK issues, but as they are all "should": ======================================================================== APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review