Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773419 --- Comment #4 from Jiri Popelka <jpopelka@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-01-18 12:02:06 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > i.e. without Provides, it needs user action to find out that the replacement is > available, and to explicitly install wArmux > > am I mistaken? > - is it enough to have Obsoletes? - I though that "Obsoletes" is more like a > Conflicts, that it would expel the old package (saying it is safe to uninstall > it, unlike Conflicts which needs manual intervention to decide which one to > keep) ... reading RPM Guide, I'm really not sure how does that work when it > comes to upgrading :-( Obsoletes is sufficient when updating. Provides is only needed when installing new package. > unfortunately, one new issue slipped in: > > SPECS/warmux.spec:60: W: macro-in-comment %configure Already fixed in that uploaded spec file. The uploaded srpm contains this problem because I was lazy to upload (it's quite big) also fixed srpm. > warmux.x86_64: E: invalid-lc-messages-dir > /usr/share/locale/cpf/LC_MESSAGES/warmux.mo > > - which is a false positive, bug #782818 filed for that Thanks, I should have filled it myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review