Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773021 --- Comment #15 from Matěj Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-01-16 09:29:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > Will you write about it to the piglit list, or should I? > > Just sent out the email to piglit list. Could you also try running: > piglit-run /usr/lib64/piglit/tests/quick.tests result0 > piglit-run /usr/lib64/piglit/tests/quick.tests result1 > piglit-summary-html summary results0 results1 > xdg-open summary/index.html > and see if you get tests that change from fail to pass etc? Are you absolutely sure you haven't done anything between two runs of tests which could affect the result? For me the only difference is one test which aborted mitmanek:~ $ json_diff -i result /tmp/result01/main /tmp/result02/main { "_update": { "tests": { "_update": { "glx/glx-tfp": { "_update": { "result": "abort" } } } } } } mitmanek:~ $ (json_diff is my script http://pypi.python.org/pypi/json_diff, and packaged in Fedora) The response from the aborted test is (the first run it passed without any message): glx-tfp: xcb_io.c:176: process_responses: Assertion `!(req && current_request && !(((long) (req->sequence) - (long) (current_request)) <= 0))' failed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review