Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771254 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-01-15 17:48:16 EST --- Hello Mattia and thanks for your interest in this review. This is a good remark, but actually this is a special case here. This library is not intended to be used 'system wide' but only from a dedicated library (libva), which last is installed with ldconfig. So libva is expected to 'dlopen' the right backend %name_drv_video.so from the special directory ( %_libdir/dri ) given the current driver used by the Xorg server. For the same reason, this is usually expected to have the shared object un-versioned in this case. So to sum-up, you can consider this library as a module or a plugin like the one provided by mesa-dri-drivers from the mesa case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review