Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772504 --- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich <volker27@xxxxxx> 2012-01-09 10:09:26 EST --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > Thank you for your suggestions. Here are the updated packages: > > > > > > SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/btkbdd.spec > > > SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/btkbdd-1.1-2.el6.src.rpm > > > > > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > > I think the package summary does not describe the package very well. The > > > > description gave me a completely different view. > > > > > > What view did it give you? I can't really think of a better description and > > > would appreciate help here. > > > > > > > The way you put it now sounds a lot better to me! :) > > Oh, I reworded the summary. I thought you were referring to the description. > > > > > Defattr is no longer necessary. If you're not going for EPEL 5, you can drop > > > > the clean section, buildroot definition and the rm in the install section. > > > > > > > (Defattr is not necessary for EPEL 5 either.) > > rpmlint whines then :( > Would you mind if I leave it there just to make el6 rpmlint (that I use) happy? No, just keep it, it doesn't hurt! > > > > > The FSF address is outdated. > > > > > > Changed that to <http://fsf.org>, which seems to be used in GPLv3. > > > > No, I meant the postal address. They moved from Temple Place to Franklin Street > > in 2005. > > Yes. The GPLv3 text does not include the postal address, just an URL, thus I > just leave just an URL here as well. I see! > > > I tried your software but messed up somehow. Let's see if I can get it working > > for me! :) > > Let me know then please. Be sure not to skip manual's BUGS section. Hm, I still don't manage, nevermind! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review