Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771485 Albert Strasheim <fullung@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fullung@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Albert Strasheim <fullung@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-01-09 08:30:07 EST --- $ rpmlint libcxgb4* libcxgb4.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Chelsio -> Chelsea libcxgb4.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) iWARP -> i Warp, warp, antiwar libcxgb4.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Userspace -> User space, User-space, Users pace libcxgb4.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libibverbs -> verbalizes libcxgb4.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iWARP -> i Warp, warp, antiwar libcxgb4.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided libcxgb4-devel libcxgb4.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/modprobe.d/libcxgb4.conf libcxgb4.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/libibverbs.d/cxgb4.driver libcxgb4.spec:13: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes %{name}-devel libcxgb4.spec:15: W: unversioned-explicit-provides libibverbs-driver.%{_arch} libcxgb4-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings. I don't have this hardware, so I can't test further unfortunately. I noticed that libmlx4-static provides libmlx4-devel-static. What's up with that? Should libcxgb4-static do the same? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review