Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772233 Albert Strasheim <fullung@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fullung@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Albert Strasheim <fullung@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-01-09 08:18:58 EST --- $ rpmlint mstflint.spec mstflint-1.4-6.fc15.x86_64.rpm mstflint.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Mellanox -> Melanoma mstflint.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided openib-mstflint mstflint.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided openib-tvflash mstflint.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided tvflash mstflint.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mstmread mstflint.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mstflint mstflint.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mstvpd mstflint.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mstregdump mstflint.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mstmwrite 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. How does mstflint relate to the mft packages provided by Mellanox? http://www.mellanox.com/content/pages.php?pg=management_tools&menu_section=34 For some reason I got the idea that mstflint is older software, but I could easily be mistaken. Is it worth packaging this for Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review