Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771111 --- Comment #6 from Ofer Schreiber <oschreib@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-01-01 11:37:49 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > <...> > > > > > > > > > > > - You need to include a license file or contact upstream to include it. > > > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text > > > > Contacted upstream. Are you sure this package MUST include a license file? > > where should we deploy it? > > Should be included in %doc with (README and AUTHORS). > > From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines: > > License Text > > If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its > own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package > must be included in %doc. If the source package does not include the text of > the > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > license(s), the packager should contact upstream and encourage them to correct > this mistake. Added README and AUTHORS to the doc dir. Still waiting to the LICENSE file from upstream. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review