Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dxpc - A Differential X Protocol Compressor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225126 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael@xxxxxxx 2007-01-31 05:16 EST ------- That could be due to a rewrite of the EncodeBuffer/DecodeBuffer code in 3.9.0. Interestingly, the Debian folk offers this dxpc for AMD64 for several months without any patch in that area of the code: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/x11/dxpc In the source I see a 32-bit bit-shifting en-/decoding working with "unsigned int" most of the time in many places, but sometimes only with simple type-specifiers. Maybe there's an oversight somewhere. Without an x86_64 test machine I won't even start careful proof-reading, however. Also, the upstream authors are encouraged to use full type-specifiers wherever possible, e.g. "unsigned int X" instead of "unsigned X" and "sizeof(unsigned int)" instead "sizeof(unsigned)". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review