Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756772 --- Comment #6 from Adam Huffman <bloch@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-12-23 12:02:28 EST --- 1. Could you explain the extra_release tag, that doesn't seem to be referred to elsewhere in the spec? 2. Most of the rpmlint errors are just spelling and can be ignored. However, it would be nice to have manpages or other documentation - not that this is a reason to hold up the package. 3. I'm assuming it depends upon too many new things to be suitable for EPEL5, so those warnings can be ignored. 4. Could those %define statements be %global instead? I've been led to believe %global is preferred now: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review