[Bug 760033] Review Request: kde-plasma-publictransport - Public Transport plasma applet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760033

--- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-12-20 19:15:43 EST ---
IMHO, the subpackages are fine as is, the openSUSE version is excessively
split.

Some comments (not a complete review yet):

> Release:        %{snapshot}%{?dist}.1
should be:
Release:        0.1.%{snapshot}%{?dist}
The next builds should then be 0.2.%{snapshot}%{?dist}, 0.3.%{snapshot}%{?dist}
etc.

BuildRequires are global, so I'd list them all together at the beginning (but
putting them where you put them works, too).

> #remove executable bit
> chmod 644 %{buildroot}/%{_kde4_datadir}/applications/kde4/timetablemate.desktop

Not sure about that one… We don't normally do this, i.e. we keep the +x bit
upstream sets, but some non-KDE folks want us to do what you did everywhere. In
practice, it will work either way because KDE Plasma does not require the +x
bit in the standard prefix.

You put the icon scriptlets into the main package and the actual icons
into -libs. They should be in the same package. (IMHO in the main package.
Those icons shouldn't be multilibbed.)

That's all I can spot at first glance, I haven't done a complete systematic
review yet though.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]