[Bug 751172] Review Request: cumin - management console for Red Hat MRG grid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751172

--- Comment #8 from Nuno Santos <nsantos@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-12-20 13:45:27 EST ---
Thanks for the explanation on the file permissions, makes sense, and for fixing
the remaining issues with the specfile.

I've rebuilt the updated srpm in mock:

$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-i386 cumin-0.1.5137-2.fc16.src.rpm 
INFO: mock.py version 1.1.18 starting...
State Changed: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
State Changed: start
INFO: Start(cumin-0.1.5137-2.fc16.src.rpm)  Config(fedora-rawhide-i386)
State Changed: lock buildroot
State Changed: clean
INFO: chroot (/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386) unlocked and deleted
State Changed: unlock buildroot
State Changed: init
State Changed: lock buildroot
Mock Version: 1.1.18
INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.18
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
State Changed: unpacking root cache
INFO: enabled yum cache
State Changed: cleaning yum metadata
INFO: enabled ccache
State Changed: running yum
State Changed: unlock buildroot
INFO: Installed packages:
State Changed: setup
State Changed: build
INFO: Done(cumin-0.1.5137-2.fc16.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-i386) 2 minutes
32 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result
State Changed: end

$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/cumin-0.1.5137-2.*.rpm
cumin.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency liberation-sans-fonts
cumin.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/cumin/cumin.conf cumin
cumin.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/cumin/cumin.conf cumin
cumin.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/cumin/cumin.conf 0600L
cumin.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/cumin cumin
cumin.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/cumin cumin
cumin.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/cumin
cumin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cumin-database
cumin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cumin-admin
cumin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cumin-bench
cumin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cumin-test
cumin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cumin-data
cumin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cumin
cumin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cumin-command-test
cumin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cumin-smoke-test
cumin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cumin-web-test
cumin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cumin-admin-test
cumin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cumin-web
cumin.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cumin-data-test
cumin.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln
cumin.src:58: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
cumin.src:58: W: macro-in-comment %{cumin_home}
cumin.src:58: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
cumin.src:58: W: macro-in-comment %{cumin_etc}
cumin.src:60: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
cumin.src:60: W: macro-in-comment %{cumin_home}
cumin.src:60: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot}
cumin.src:60: W: macro-in-comment %{_sysconfdir}
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 26 warnings.

(same warnings/errors as before; errors have been explained)

Looks good, package is APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]