[Bug 769002] Review Request: sugar-toolkit-gtk3 - the Sugar toolkit for gtk3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769002

--- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-12-20 12:07:17 EST ---
There's a few bits in here that need to be cleaned up.

- rpmlint output

$ rpmlint SPECS/sugar-toolkit-gtk3.spec
SRPMS/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1-1.fc17.src.rpm RPMS/x86_64/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-*
sugar-toolkit-gtk3.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US datastore ->
data store, data-store, devastator
sugar-toolkit-gtk3.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sugar3/_sugarbaseext.so
_sugarbaseext.so()(64bit)
sugar-toolkit-gtk3.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sugar3/presence/tubeconn.py
sugar-toolkit-gtk3.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sugar3/presence/sugartubeconn.py
sugar-toolkit-gtk3.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/rpm/macros.sugar
sugar-toolkit-gtk3.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin
/usr/lib64/libsugarext.so.0.0.0
sugar-toolkit-gtk3.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/lib64/libsugarext.so.0.0.0
sugar-toolkit-gtk3.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sugar-activity
sugar-toolkit-gtk3.x86_64: E: invalid-lc-messages-dir
/usr/share/locale/cpp/LC_MESSAGES/sugar-toolkit-gtk3.mo
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/rsvg-wrapper.c
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/gsm-session.h
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/rsvg-wrapper.h
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/eggdesktopfile.c
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/acme-volume.c
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/acme-volume.h
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/gdk-wrapper.c
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/gsm-client.h
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/gsm-client.c
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/acme-volume-alsa.h
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/gsm-session.c
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/acme-volume-alsa.c
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/gsm-app.c
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/gsm-xsmp.c
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/gsm-client-xsmp.c
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/gsm-xsmp.h
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/gsm-client-xsmp.h
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1/src/sugar3/eggdesktopfile.h
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Invokation ->
Invocation, Invitation, Innovation
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
gobject -> object, g object
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 24 errors, 6 warnings.

+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
+ license matches the actual package license
+ latest version packaged

+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
  354540e82bfb17699b5df4d37dc25faf sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.95.1.tar.bz2
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
  tested using koji scratch build
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
- binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+
does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ Package perserves timestamps on install
+ Permissions on files must be set properly 
+ %defattr line
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package runtime 
n/a header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
+ libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a devel must require the fully versioned base
+ packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8

Optional:

n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream to include it
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
- reviewer should build the package in mock/koji
  needs BuildRequires: python-devel
- the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
n/a review should test the package functions as described
- scriptlets should be sane
  needs pre/post ldconfig
n/a non -devel packages should require fully versioned base
n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
/usr/sbin
n/a Package should have man files

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]