Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759712 --- Comment #4 from Eric Smith <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-12-15 19:38:53 EST --- Thanks for reviewing this. I agree with your patch for REVISION, will include it in the next spec, and will report a bug upstream if there isn't one already. I'll look into the gcc dependency issue with rawhide. I didn't have that problem when I built the llvm-3.0rc3 and dragonegg packages on F16. I'll install rawhide in a VM for testing and report back when I have an updated spec and SRPM that fixes it. I respectfully disagree with changing the macro-in-comment warnings as they are in comments copied directly from the existing gcc-python-plugin spec, and doubled percent signs might be confusing to anyone trying to actually understand the comments. I'd rather have the rpmlint warnings. However, if you really feel strongly that those warnings have to be fixed, let me know, and I'll do it. LLVM is supported on i386 and x86_64, which are the current Fedora Primary Architectures. The Fedora llvm package spec excludes use of ocaml on s390, s390x, and sparc64, but does not exclude those or any other architectures. While I have a hard time believing that LLVM will work on all of the Fedora Secondary Architectures, if the LLVM spec doesn't exclude them I don't think the DragonEgg spec needs to either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review