Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757851 Radek Novacek <rnovacek@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rnovacek@xxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |rnovacek@xxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Radek Novacek <rnovacek@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-12-15 05:06:46 EST --- Name: ok License: not ok, batchextract.(h|cpp) have BSD license and are compiled to ark binary in main package, so licence should be BSD and GPLv2+ (same as for -libs subpackage) Source: ok BRs/Reqs: ok Macros used consistently: ok ldconfig: ok Desktop file validations: ok Locales: ok Docs: COPYING should be installed Devel: NA Files: ok Build: ok rpmlint: no need to fix ark.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gzip -> zip, grip, g zip ark.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rar -> arr, ear, tar ark.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lha -> la, ha, lea ark.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/applications/kde4/ark.desktop ark-libs.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided kdeutils-ark-libs ark-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 11 warnings. Please, fix the license and docs and this package will be good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review