Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767556 --- Comment #1 from Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-12-14 07:21:17 EST --- rpmlint scl-utils-20111209-1.fc16.src.rpm scl-utils.src:11: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 11, tab: line 1) rpmlint ../rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/scl-utils-* scl-utils.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided stack scl-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation scl-utils.x86_64: E: dir-or-file-in-opt /opt/rh scl-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary scl scl-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary scl_enabled scl-utils-build.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided stack-build scl-utils-build.x86_64: W: no-documentation scl-utils-build.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rpm/macros.dsc scl-utils-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/scl-utils-20111209/scl.c I suggest add the buildroot macro, because it might be needed in EPEL-5. Same problem with the clean section and defattr in the files section and "rm -rf" in the install section. Obsoleted and not provided stack is probably ok, but it might be possible to remove stack at all, because it was never officially built. Please, fix fsf address. This would be one of many unfixable reviews ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review