Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760645 --- Comment #9 from Fabien Archambault <marbolangos@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-12-13 04:02:17 EST --- Hello, Sorry for the delay to answer. @Jussi Lehtola: I will take a look at your spec version to see if there are some things I can add or modify. Concerning my use of ergo, I was asked to compile it on a cluster where users will have to use it so I will have to follow updates and improvements in the package. If your question was about following the package. Using it on the computer is not yet an objective for me but I have some colleagues who should be interested to install it on there computer to run some small single points before going to cluster or smp calculations. I know this is a very specific package but it is at the same level as mpqc or cp2k which are already within the repositories. I believe adding it to Fedora and CentOS is a way for such a package to be found and used. For the sponsoring, I made one informal review (see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760897). It was an easy, I will make another one soon. I am also working on another package (psicode also named psi3) still related to quantum chemistry but I have an issue with upstream not replying to my emails... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review