Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765651 --- Comment #2 from Matthieu Saulnier <casper.le.fantom@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-12-11 23:54:33 EST --- Hello, (In reply to comment #1) > instead of use %{_sharedstatedir}/asterisk/* > i think it is better to use: > - %{_sharedstatedir}asterisk/static-http/ > - %{_sharedstatedir}/asterisk/scripts > - %{_sharedstatedir}/asterisk/gui_backups Done > SRPMS: [OK] > $ rpmlint asterisk-gui-2.0-1.20111208svn5218.fc16.src.rpm > asterisk-gui.src: W: invalid-url Source0: > asterisk-gui-2.0-20111208svn5218.tar.gz > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > > they are many warning and error with: > $ rpmlint asterisk-gui.spec > > could you fix this? Done So, this is the latest release: Spec URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/asterisk-gui.spec SRPM URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/asterisk-gui-2.0-2.20111212svn5218.fc16.src.rpm $ rpmlint *.rpm asterisk-gui.noarch: E: zero-length /var/lib/asterisk/static-http/config/blank.html asterisk-gui.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/asterisk-gui-2.0/COPYING asterisk-gui.src: W: invalid-url Source0: asterisk-gui-2.0-20111212svn5218.tar.xz 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. /var/lib/asterisk/static-http/config/blank.html is needed by the program incorrect-fsf-address -> I'm asking with upstram to fix it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review