Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757156 --- Comment #9 from Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-12-07 15:53:41 EST --- Re: comment #7 > Regarding your plans for participation in Fedora, do you see yourself sticking > to perl modules or might you have other things to bring in in the future? I want to contribute packages which I need myself, but recently everything I have needed was already packaged except some Perl modules. So for now, I will stick with Perl modules. (context: I have been building RPM packages for at least 12 years now, does anybody here remember Red Hat Contrib|Net, the early community packaging effort for Red Hat Linux?). > Are there any more "leaf" packages, that don't have any non-Fedora > dependencies? E.g. perl-TeX-Encode, perl-Scalar-String, perl-IO-Socket-Multicast, perl-Data-Integer, perl-Data-Float, or perl-DBD-ODBC. > > Also, they all currently have > > the problem mentioned in comment #1 (directory ownership of > > %{perl_vendorarch}... as created by cpanspec). > > This is more a matter of taste. Well, perhaps the Packaging:Perl wiki page should be modified to not have this requirements then? (I cannot check the exact wording as Fedora wiki currently says 503 Service Unavailable for me). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review