Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757156 --- Comment #6 from Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-12-06 12:06:20 EST --- Re: comment #4 my fault, I have added dependency on Test::More back. I have also bumped the release number and added a %changelog entry as you suggest: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/tmp/perl-Env-C.spec http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/tmp/perl-Env-C-0.08-2.fc16.src.rpm Re: comment #5 I have asked upstream to clarify the licensing. No, I have not submitted any other packages. Should I submit them? I wanted to go through the whole process of making a Fedora package with the single package first. If anybody is interested in (pre-)review, I have uploaded them to http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/tmp/fedora-packages/. Some of them cannot be built in mock as-is, because they depend on other packages from this set, so they have probably to be reviewed in a single request. Also, they all curretly have the problem mentioned in comment #1 (directory ownership of %{perl_vendorarch}... as created by cpanspec). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review