Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751344 --- Comment #4 from Trevor McKay <tmckay@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-12-05 09:37:14 EST --- Thanks, sesame is really the outlier here, notes on the rest: mace is mostly defunct at this point, it was a QMF message traffic simulator for testing cumin. It would be great if it worked, but at present it doesn't build and we test in other ways. basil was some proof of concept/demo stuff from early development that is not currently used. The rest are all modules that are part of cumin. While a few of them could theoretically be broken out and used independently, practically they exist to serve the needs of "cumin-web" (cumin) and "cumin-data" (mint), the two functional halves that make up "cumin" from the customer perspective. The source tree may be a little over-modularized from that perspective. I am a relative newcomer, this is my perspective. Cleaning up the repo is on my long term todo list. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Thoughts, short of making sesame its own fedora project? > > It looks really strange, that the cumin svn repo is basically a mix of several > code projects... > > Shouldn't they all have their own repository and cumin provides only scripts to > check them out and build together (seems that's the goal of "mgmt"...)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review