Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749299 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #8 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-12-04 16:33:34 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) > OLD: > > Just to summarize what is left from above to be resolved: > > The -devel package has scriptlets of > > postinstall program: /sbin/ldconfig > postuninstall program: /sbin/ldconfig > > and I think it should not despite containing a .so file. I need to look some > more. Guidelines say: "every binary RPM package which contains shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun" The .so in the devel package is a symlink - so ldconfig should not be called in the scriptlets for the devel package. > Now something that seems conceptually odd to me? > > /etc/rc.d/init.d/lcgdm-dav > > appears to run standard httpd with a custom configuration. This is a new > concept to me, I have not see else where. > > Having multiple start up scripts start up daemons in different ways seems odd? > Why is this not just a virtual host configuration in /etc/httpd/conf.d? It's > essentially a web site/application isn't it? I agree this looks really odd. The normal thing is to add a configuration file in /etc/httpd/conf.d and run services in the standard httpd instance that is started by the httpd start-up script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review