Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: poker-network - A poker server, client and abstract user interface library Alias: poker-network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219972 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-29 06:52 EST ------- The dependency of poker-web on poker-selinux is debatable. Many people, for reasons best known to themselves, run web servers with SELinux disabled or in permissive mode. For these people, it's not necessary to have poker-selinux in order for poker-web to work. So the alternatives are either: 1. Include the depenency (the status quo) and possibly pull in lots of additional packages (potentially the whole SELinux ecosystem on a system not currently using SELinux). 2. Omit the dependency and possibly confuse users that don't know about the -selinux subpackage. I know that this can happen despite the inclusion of a README.SELinux file in a main package that explains about installing the -selinux subpackage, even from experienced people that really should know better (I maintain the mod_fcgid package in Extras, which has a -selinux subpackage that is not a hard dependency). A decision for the maintainer I think; just be aware of the pros and cons each way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review