[Bug 753240] Review Request: colorhug-client - Tools for the Hughski Colorimeter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753240

--- Comment #5 from Richard Hughes <rhughes@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-11-28 11:57:14 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> [!]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
>  Is is really correct for both executables to be in libexec? Isn't colorhug at
> least intended to be used directly by the user from the command line?

colorhug the command is designed to be used by scripts, it's not at all
friendly to the end user and it's not really how I want people to interact with
the hardware. There's already a colorhug driver in colord, and using that dbus
interface is much easier and kinder on the user.

In the git master version of colorhug-client there's a firmware flasher GTK GUI
in /usr/bin that is designed to be used by users.

Thanks for the speedy review,

Richard.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]