Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754554 --- Comment #6 from Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-11-17 16:25:54 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > > Another thing: Upstream version is 0.4 not 0.4.1. Version numbers in Fedora > > > > should match versions from upstream tarball. I know you are upstream, but it's > > > > still better to be consistent. > > > > > > I actually pushed the tag for presence-0.4.1, this should match upstream. Or am > > > I missing something? > > > > Well, configure.ac in tarball states it's version 0.4 so I assumed that. But > > you're right that it's created from 0.4.1 tag so I guess it's more of a > > configure.ac problem. > > Ah yes, I need to get used to update all those relevant places ... > One question remains for me: How do I "mark" the software as GPLv2+ (and not > just GPLv2)? This is usually done by adding "or (at your option) any later version" to licensing headers of source files. Look for "How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs" in your COPYING file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review