Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624182 François Cami <fdc@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mariobl@freenet.d | |e) --- Comment #7 from François Cami <fdc@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-11-15 14:42:23 EST --- Thank you for reviewing. My comments below. [X] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. As far as I can read in the sources (or as detected by my translation software, because it's French only), there's no implicit declaration of GPLv3. Seems to be rather GPL+ than GPLv3. Would you explain the French README please? [X] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. The README implies GPL+ indeed, yet the website at: http://francois.gannaz.free.fr/Littre/horsligne.php links explicitely to: http://fsffrance.org/gpl/gpl-fr.fr.html which is, unless I am mistaken, an unofficial translation of GPLv3. So I took what I thought was the safe route, which is GPLv3. Do you agree? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review