Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754185 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-11-15 12:33:34 EST --- Hi Michael, Here are some initial review remarks: - The following lines can be dropped (because of the automatic RPM 4.9 dependency magic) : %global _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 %global __find_requires %{_mingw32_findrequires} %global __find_provides %{_mingw32_findprovides} - Why have you added manual Requires tags for mingw32-gettext and mingw32-iconv? Dependencies should normally be handled by the automatic RPM 4.9 dependency magic so you shouldn't need to provide manual Requires tags here - Is regenerating the configure script and Makefiles using the autotools/libtool really necessary? - Is the PATH override in the %build section really needed? - The line 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' from the %install section, the entire %clean section and the %defattr line can be removed as modern RPM doesn't require it anymore - The folder %{_mingw32_sysconfdir}/pkcs11 is currently un-owned. Please add a '%dir %{_mingw32_sysconfdir}/pkcs11' to the %files section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review