[Bug 221372] Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rb_libtorrent - A C++ BitTorrent library aiming to be the best alternative
Alias: rb_libtorrent

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221372





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-01-26 04:48 EST -------
Before checking this..

Can't the conflict between libtorrent <-> this package be
avoided simply by moving
* /usr/lib/libtorrent.so -> /usr/lib/librb_torrent.so
* /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libtorrent.pc -> /usr/lib/pkgconfig/librb_torrent.pc
?

I don't want to make use of "conflict" simply because the
file entry duplicates when some seemingly-easy solution exists,
because this type of file conflicts always occur on making
compat version rpm.

Would you consider to aviod using conflict by renaming?
I also suggest when you agree, the "real" dynamic library
"/usr/lib/libtorrent.so.0.1.0" and the header directory
"/usr/include/libtorrent" should be renamed as such.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]