[Bug 751925] Review Request: python-tables - Hierarchical datasets in Python

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751925

--- Comment #4 from Thibault North <thibault.north@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-11-10 21:04:10 EST ---
Hello Brendan,
Thanks for your review.

>The %check seems to
>take an awfully long time, and there are a number of test directories
>installed.

>I'm just wondering if they're really necessary. 

I don't really know. For python-numexpr, I was suggested to add these kind of
checks. I guess it will help the tracking of some bugs if tests fail at a
rebuild.

>You could consider a separate doc package also for the examples and
>documentation, but that's just a suggestion. Full review below, I'll wait for
>your reply before passing.

Done.

>[!] Be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing
>Guidelines 
>*** You just need to specify the lrucache.py is licensed under AFL

License is set to BSD and AFL: is that good enough?

>[?] Has BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel
>
>I'm really not sure if this is still required?

I don't know. Other python- packages I have seen don't have it.

>[!] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
>*** perhaps python2-devel rather than python-devel, although this is rather
>cosmetic

Fixed.
Thanks again,
Thibault

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]