Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607405 --- Comment #8 from Ismael Olea <ismael@xxxxxxxx> 2011-11-10 07:15:45 EST --- * rpmlint: $ rpmlint -iv /var/lib/mock/fedora-15-i386/result/poppler-sharp-0.0.2-2.fc15.src.rpm poppler-sharp.src: I: checking poppler-sharp.src: I: checking-url http://www.github.com/jacintos/poppler-sharp (timeout 10 seconds) poppler-sharp.src: I: checking-url http://github.com/downloads/jacintos/poppler-sharp/poppler-sharp-0.0.2.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. fine $ rpmlint -iv /var/lib/mock/fedora-15-i386/result/poppler-sharp-0.0.2-2.fc15.i686.rpm poppler-sharp.i686: I: checking poppler-sharp.i686: I: checking-url http://www.github.com/jacintos/poppler-sharp (timeout 10 seconds) poppler-sharp.i686: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. poppler-sharp.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. here rpmlint not adheres to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono, so it's fine as it is. [olea@patxuko rpmbuild]$ rpmlint -iv /var/lib/mock/fedora-15-i386/result/poppler-sharp-devel-0.0.2-2.fc15.i686.rpm poppler-sharp-devel.i686: I: checking poppler-sharp-devel.i686: I: checking-url http://www.github.com/jacintos/poppler-sharp (timeout 10 seconds) poppler-sharp-devel.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. if there is non trivial information to developers would be nice to add here; if not, it is fine AFAIK * I would suggest to modify translation from %description -l es Genera administración de enlaces a Poppler usando herramientas GAPI to Genera los vínculos administrados usando las herramientas GAPI * I understood, reading the linked issue 4 this modification is incompatible now: #libpoppler-glib fix https://github.com/jacintos/poppler-sharp/issues/4 sed -i 's/libpoppler-glib\.so\.6/libpoppler-glib\.so/g' sources/poppler-sharp.dll.config Correct me if I'm wrong. * gacutil is now required to install DLL in Fedora (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono#gacutil_in_a_spec_file) Please apply the suggested changes and use mock for next rebuilds for better control of potential collateral effects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review