Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747849 --- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-11-05 06:43:45 EDT --- > I guess I should include a copy in the devel sub-package, > if I don't require it: Correct. There is no requirement for the -devel subpackage to depend on the base package explicitly. Hence the second part of the guideline applies: | [...] if a subpackage is independent of any base package (it does not | require it, either implicitly or explicitly), it must include copies of | any license texts (as present in the source) which are applicable to | the files contained within the subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review