Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750013 Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-11-03 10:50:00 EDT --- Good: - rpmlint checks return: Lots of bogus spelling errors and: clucene09-core.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/clucene09-core-0.9.21b/README The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile's %prep section for example using iconv(1). clucene09-core.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/clucene09-core-0.9.21b/LGPL.license This file has wrong end-of-line encoding, usually caused by creation or modification on a non-Unix system. It could prevent it from being displayed correctly in some circumstances. clucene09-core.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/clucene09-core-0.9.21b/LGPL.license The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. Fix these. clucene09-core-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. Either correct this or comment on the rational for this placement in the spec. clucene09-core-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Fix this if you can. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ( LGPLv2+ or ASL 2.0 ) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r Mock build in progress to test BRs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review