Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rhts - A system for developing automated tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224271 peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-24 23:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) [..] > * fields Source0 must be point to the full location of the tarball for check up. While this is generally true, it is not the case for source snapshots (unless there is a valid URL for it, such as some projects' nightly or weekly CVS tarballs). (In reply to comment #0) > E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/tests > E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/scratchspace > E: rhts-test-env dir-or-file-in-mnt /mnt/testarea > E: rhts-test-env non-standard-dir-perm /mnt/testarea 01777 Why are these /mnt directories needed? If they are valid, would they be better as locations in /srv or similar? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review