Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: csync2 - A cluster synchronization tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223633 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-24 08:32 EST ------- Just tested. One can either edit /etc/services or add the following two lines to /etc/xinetd.d/csync2: type = UNLISTED port = <desired port value> Which makes me suggest the following - modify a bit your patch as to include these two lines, using the default port value assumed by csync2 ( 30865 ) - add a README.FEDORA pointing this difference towards the included docs - bug upstream to modify the docs (the paper.pdf) What do you think ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review