Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 Michal Sekletar <msekleta@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |msekleta@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #122 from Michal Sekletar <msekleta@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-27 13:15:07 EDT --- Hello Lee, I am new maintainer of mgetty in Fedora. I've checked conflict with my package. At first glance it seems like there are two paths which are common for hylafax and sendfax, it's /usr/bin/faxrm binary and it's manpage. I'm afraid that we can't work this out using Alternatives because I believe that each conflicting binary is manipulating another fax job queue. I will investigate further and I will try to find some solution to this issue. Another problem is general confusion caused by both packages installed at the same time. Many binaries have same names and they differ "only" by install location in filesystem. From user point of view it might be very confusing to see "the same" binary twice, one in /usr/bin and the other located in /usr/sbin. If you know already about some possible solution to these issues, please let me know. Please feel free to correct me if I've made some mistake. I am not very familiar with your package so far, but I will be happy to see hylafax included in Fedora because as I read through the comments it seems that you've put some extraordinary effort to get hylafax included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review