Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727155 Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-20 06:31:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > I was refering to "... same licence as Ruby(See COPYING) or LGPL ...". So the > > whole license tag should be something like > > Please could you be more specific? The only reference to LGPL is in file > "usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fast_gettext-0.6.1/lib/fast_gettext/vendor/README.rdoc" > on line 155. This refers to file which is not included in the gem an will never > be. Am I missing something? Sorry, my mistake. I was looking at a newer license of the forked gettext library. The version that was forked was licensed under Ruby at the time, so your License field is OK. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review