Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728956 --- Comment #26 from Michal Novotny <minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-18 09:00:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > I do not think it makes sense to rename the Fedora package if upstream stays at > the php-virt-control name. Strictly said the name as it is does not break the > Fedora naming guidelines so there is no requirement for it to be changed to > pass the Fedora review. It was just my suggestion to you to rename it upstream > to fulfil the wish of the PHP upstream and to make the name more descriptive. Tom, I know you mean it good way but considering the fact I did buy a domain on my own expenses (although hosted on Daniel's server) rendering the project my 'spare time' project I don't like the renaming. The situation would be different if I didn't have the domain bought for 5 years yet however the situation is different with me having it already bought. So is that ok to review it now or what should I do? The reason why I don't like the idea of renaming the project is already mentioned and I don't want to buy a new domain just because of the name change as the DNS record matches exactly the upstream project name. Michal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review