[Bug 742759] Review Request: perl-Text-Aspell - Perl interface to the GNU Aspell library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742759

Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa@redhat.c |
                   |om)                         |

--- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-17 10:10:53 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I'm sorry, but this package was orphaned for a reason. Major applications are
> now using hunspell instead of aspell (feature from F-9). All packages dependent
> on perl-Text-Aspell should be fixed to do not use it.
> You might didn't notice message on fedora-devel:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-April/150919.html
> 
> And last git commit in old repo says:
>     Retired in favor of perl-Text-Hunspell.

This is ridiculous. There are clearly still Fedora packages using aspell.
Should we kick all tcl apps out of Fedora on the grounds that they should be
ported to gtk? What about qt?

This package is functional. I am willing to maintain it. There are no legal
concerns around it. Thus, it meets the criteria for inclusion.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]