Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739856 Martin Preisler <mpreisle@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mpreisle@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #17 from Martin Preisler <mpreisle@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-17 08:02:20 EDT --- I believe that in this case the backends can never work without the base package, they don't even represent any value without it so the base package owning the directory is the preferred approach in my eyes. The chances of that situation changing are very very low. Updated Spec URL: http://mpreisle.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/opendbx/opendbx.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://mpreisle.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/opendbx/opendbx-1.4.5-4.fc15.src.rpm I have made the base package own the directory and the backends don't own it anymore. Thanks Tomas for taking this package for a review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review