Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745510 Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aquini@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #3 from Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-15 15:12:33 EDT --- Howdy, (In reply to comment #2) > components will be optimal. Moreover it will require libvirt and kvm for most > of the tasks so I'm not sure what would be used for on secondary architectures. Could vdsm be installed on another arch just to manage, remotely, a KVM HV? If yes, then it might be interesting having it available on those other architectures, otherwise I guess maintaining the ExclusiveArch: x86_64 makes more sense. Cheers! --aquini -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review