Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 --- Comment #7 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-13 15:11:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Bundles lapack-3.1.1 sources -> investigate unbundling, if sources are > > necessary to build, contact lapack maintainer to add a -source subpackage > > and BuildRequire it. > > > > Bundles some files from lapack-3.0 sources, at least lapack/getri/*.f. > > Maybe I'll need to ask for an exception. A generic -source package is not > enough, since the build scripts assume a specific version. > > Although, I see that this problem is solved in ATLAS by just BR'ing the static > version of the LAPACK libraries. Maybe the same thing could be done with > OpenBLAS as well. Please do. If you definitely need an exception, please file a ticket to the FPC: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/newticket and be prepared to answer the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Standard_questions > > Minimum requirements for Fedora are still Pentium Pro or newer. > > Will this run on a Pentium Pro? > > Judging from GotoBLAS_01Readme.txt, the minimum CPU is Pentium3 or Athlon. > If someone still runs older systems, they can use ATLAS instead. > > It would be of course possible to limit this package to only, say, x86_64 > architecture, where it will run on every system. OK. By the way, does it build on non-x86? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review