Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745510 --- Comment #2 from Federico Simoncelli <fsimonce@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-13 05:52:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is there a technical reason for the ExclusiveArch: x86_64 ? We (the secondary > architectures) prefer to build packages on all possible architectures. At the moment I am not aware of technical reasons for not building it on secondary architectures. Sadly I cannot guarantee that it will actually work (especially the safelease part) and that its interaction with the other components will be optimal. Moreover it will require libvirt and kvm for most of the tasks so I'm not sure what would be used for on secondary architectures. Anyway if it's just easier and more consistent to build it for all the architectures we could try to fix the build errors (if any). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review