Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-10 03:56:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > They also have dropped the non-gem use for rubygems (it's not updated in > packaging guidelines!). I proposed this change, since the non-gem use is bad designed and I can't see any benefit of such packages. However, there was not much done WRT update of packaging guidelines, but I'll try to collect some ideas in [1]. Going to add this proposal right now. (In reply to comment #3) > Sounds good. Good to know that the packaging rubygems for non-gem use guideline > is going away, feel free to remove the non-gem subpackage from this altogether > if you want (this was the first package that I've seen do this in a very long > time). > > Also how definite is it that Ruby 1.9.3 is going into Fedora 17? > > Thank you. I am highly interested in R 1.9.3 in F17 and I did not heard any strong objections, so it is highly probable that I will push them forward. Of course, you can check Ruby-SIG ML as was mentioned by Shawn. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_talk:Ruby -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review