Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741626 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-08 05:30:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Is there a CMake possibility to put them into the ser directory instead? > > Running "mv *.i ser/" after building works, but looks rather hackish... > > Maybe. But these are include files... How about a complete cp then? e.g. mkdir ser; cd ser cp ../* . %cmake... etc cd .. Do you intend to build both serial and parallel versions? How do you want to name them? par/ppackmol would only be a script that calls packmol with OMP_THREADS With copying around anything from above, it would be possible to install par/packmol as ppackmol and get a backtrace of the segfault with abrt. > > - Why are GPLv3 headers -> GPL+? > > I'd expect GPLv3+ (or GPLv3only) here: > > (minimal) version = version in COPYING. > > > > It would be best to ask upstream to clarify it. > > .. where do you see gplv3 headers? GPL+ for me is any GPL version, that exists and that will come in the future. When adding a GPLv3 COPYING, I either want to have the program licensed under GPLv3 or GPLv3+, but not with GPLv2. But I'm not a lawyer, so asking upstream to clarify it is the best way to be sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review