Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743370 --- Comment #3 from Nathanael Noblet <nathanael@xxxxxxx> 2011-10-06 17:49:24 EDT --- I am a packager fas username is gnat. Also something I'm aware of but not sure how to solve yet. Upstream is in git and have released a few versions. However they don't build cleanly due to hardcoded paths in their Makefile. So I forked their git repo (github) and generated my own tarball that includes the patches I've made... How should this be packaged? take their tarball and using git history apply a bunch of patches until upstream includes them? Or just use my git fork pulling in new versions as they make them?? Spec URL: http://www.gnat.ca/libsmartpen.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gnat.ca/libsmartpen-0.6-2.src.rpm the sitelib0 was me copying from func.spec which has them conditionally defined but what I wanted was python_sitearch and didn't know they were provided by python-devel so just made up my own. I should have checked the guidelines instead of another spec I guess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review