Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713313 --- Comment #13 from Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-06 17:17:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > I noticed, your basically packaging the head revision now. Yeah, I've emailed the upstream author several times, and he hasn't responded. I also found another person on GitHub who has experienced the same thing, and I'm concerned that I'll have to carry on a fork. A few days ago I sent out a formal email to the MIT kerberos list: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/kerberos/2011-October/017657.html I received a few responses off-list. I've got beginnings of the fork up at https://gitorious.org/ktdreyer/msktutil . The other patches that I've seen around on the internet are basically similar to my LIBS patch and krb5-config patch. I've emailed the Debian and Suse maintainers to see if they have any patches they'd like to contribute. I'm picturing that I'll do a formal 0.4.1 or a 0.5 release in the future. > Small remark: I think you can simplify the if clauses: I tried this initially, but IIRC "rhel" evaluated to zero on Fedora, which meant that 0 <= 6, and the statement inadvertently evaluated as true on F16. I'll re-examine this before I submit to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review