Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: obexftp - Tool to access devices via the OBEX protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223618 tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-20 16:42 EST ------- Good: - rpmlint checks return: W: obexftp-python no-documentation W: obexftp-perl no-documentation W: obexftp-devel no-documentation All safe to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r Looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review