[Bug 743007] Review Request: rubygem-introspection - Dynamic inspection of the hierarchy of method definitions on a Ruby object

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743007

Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #6 from Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-04 05:48:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > * %{geminstdir}/README.md should be marked as %doc.
> 
> Moved into -doc subpackage and marked as %doc
> 
> > * The way you run tests doesn't actually run them (0 tests, 0 assertions, 0
> > failures, 0 errors). When you run them this way: 'testrb -Ilib
> > ./test/*_test.rb', you can discover, that you need to include BR:
> > rubygem(metaclass) and BR: rubygem(builder) (the second one to satisfy the
> > require 'blankslate' in snapshot_test.rb). Please clarify these BRs.
> 
> Good catch!

Great, the tests are run now.

> 
> > * Consider including license file from the upstream in the package (maybe as a
> > separate source).
> 
> I'll include the license file as soon as it will be available in official
> release. In the meantime, I have added comment into the .spec file. It is not
> hard requirement, so it should not be blocker.
> 

Sounds fine.

> > * Could you explain if there currently is a particular reason for R:
> > rubygem-metaclass < 0.1?
> 
> It follows the upstream suggested dependency, i.e. the original ~> 0.0.1
> dependency transform into > 0.0.1 and <= 0.1, see [1]
> 

Yes, sorry about that.

> 
> Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-introspection.spec
> SRPM URL:
> http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-introspection-0.0.2-3.fcf17.src.rpm
> 
> 
> 
> [1] http://docs.rubygems.org/read/chapter/16

Package seems OK now, APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]