[Bug 743007] Review Request: rubygem-introspection - Dynamic inspection of the hierarchy of method definitions on a Ruby object

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743007

--- Comment #4 from Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-04 03:26:41 EDT ---
* %{geminstdir}/README.md should be marked as %doc.
* The way you run tests doesn't actually run them (0 tests, 0 assertions, 0
failures, 0 errors). When you run them this way: 'testrb -Ilib
./test/*_test.rb', you can discover, that you need to include BR:
rubygem(metaclass) and BR: rubygem(builder) (the second one to satisfy the
require 'blankslate' in snapshot_test.rb). Please clarify these BRs.
* Consider including license file from the upstream in the package (maybe as a
separate source).
* Could you explain if there currently is a particular reason for R:
rubygem-metaclass < 0.1?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]